<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Podcasts Part 2 - Accessibility</title>
	<atom:link href="http://accessible.ie/?feed=rss2&#038;p=53" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://accessible.ie/?p=53</link>
	<description>The Irish Perspective on Accessibility and Usability</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 06:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sean Nicholls - Blog Archive &#187; Do Podcasts make the Web more Accessible?</title>
		<link>http://accessible.ie/?p=53&#038;cpage=1#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Nicholls - Blog Archive &#187; Do Podcasts make the Web more Accessible?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 12:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accessible.ie/?p=53#comment-75</guid>
		<description>[...] Theres an interesting blog entry over at Accessibility.ie that mentions this very subject.   Posted by Sean Nicholls in Podcasting [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Theres an interesting blog entry over at Accessibility.ie that mentions this very subject.   Posted by Sean Nicholls in Podcasting [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andy carvin</title>
		<link>http://accessible.ie/?p=53&#038;cpage=1#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>andy carvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 18:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accessible.ie/?p=53#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Your article somewhat misinterprets what I was saying about podcasting and accessibility. I personally do not believe that transcripts run against the ethos of podcasting. If you read what I wrote, you will see I was attributing this attitude to other podcasters who ignore accessibility issues or aren't familiar with accessibility. &lt;a href="http://www.andycarvin.com/archives/2004/12/making_podcasti.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Quoting from my transcript&lt;/a&gt;:

&lt;blockquote&gt;A few days into the conversation, Grant Laird of the Texas Deaf Network posted a brief response to the thread. He said,"Don't forget that podcasting probably doesn't support transcripts for the deaf community."

My first reaction was, "That's a fair point.... I'm more than happy to post transcripts of my podcasts." For me, at least, that makes a lot of sense. But will other podcasters feel the same way? Unfortunately, I think the answer is generally no, I think many would argue that the whole notion of posting podcast transcripts actually runs counter to the ethos of podcasting. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

As you can see here, I'm suggesting that this is a view of of many podcasters, some of whom I go on to cite in my article. The point of this was to suggest that transcripts should &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; go against the ethos of podcasting, not the other way around. While transcripts aren't always possible for near-real-time podcasts, it makes sense for producers of regularly scheduled podcasts to provide a transcript, or at least a detailed summary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your article somewhat misinterprets what I was saying about podcasting and accessibility. I personally do not believe that transcripts run against the ethos of podcasting. If you read what I wrote, you will see I was attributing this attitude to other podcasters who ignore accessibility issues or aren&#8217;t familiar with accessibility. <a href="http://www.andycarvin.com/archives/2004/12/making_podcasti.html" rel="nofollow">Quoting from my transcript</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>A few days into the conversation, Grant Laird of the Texas Deaf Network posted a brief response to the thread. He said,&#8221;Don&#8217;t forget that podcasting probably doesn&#8217;t support transcripts for the deaf community.&#8221;</p>
<p>My first reaction was, &#8220;That&#8217;s a fair point&#8230;. I&#8217;m more than happy to post transcripts of my podcasts.&#8221; For me, at least, that makes a lot of sense. But will other podcasters feel the same way? Unfortunately, I think the answer is generally no, I think many would argue that the whole notion of posting podcast transcripts actually runs counter to the ethos of podcasting. </p></blockquote>
<p>As you can see here, I&#8217;m suggesting that this is a view of of many podcasters, some of whom I go on to cite in my article. The point of this was to suggest that transcripts should <i>not</i> go against the ethos of podcasting, not the other way around. While transcripts aren&#8217;t always possible for near-real-time podcasts, it makes sense for producers of regularly scheduled podcasts to provide a transcript, or at least a detailed summary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
